Tuesday 21 December 2010

The Hand Of History: Aubergine – Chelsea, Thursday 29th July, 2010

Word of mouth is a dangerous thing. I've debated the pitfalls of hearing about how great somewhere is before you try it, but we soldier on in the knowledge that someone is always going to have tried whichever neighbourhood gem we have unearthed first. Particularly if you live in London. That comes with the territory of course, and writing about food isn't something which could be called exclusive these days, particularly with the explosion of blogs similar to (but not as good as) this.
 

Sometimes you have to bite the bullet and visit somewhere that has been recommended to you, written about to death and generally lived in the culinary fabric of the city for donkey's years. Aubergine of Chelsea is one such place. Or it was. Perhaps the one new thing I can give you with this review is that it no longer exists. Some weeks ago, the other half and I were walking past it but I had to check twice that it was indeed Aubergine. The place had been gutted and was in the process of being re-modelled. An equation sprung to mind: no more Michelin stars = desperate restaurateurs.
 

Aubergine was unfortunately one of a few London restaurants to lose a star at the beginning of this year. No-starred restaurants in Chelsea are not quite what the doctor ordered, so clearly a shake-up and a strip-down were quickly requested. The end product is the recently re-opened and re-named 11 Park Walk; a rather uninspiring name at best. This sort of thing can work if you're running an upmarket gastropub or bistro in the centre of town, but not in a leafy side street off the Kings Road. Looking at pictures of the new place, it seems they've pawned off the old charm of Aubergine in favour of a more sleek and modern veneer of uplights, stone walls and yellow haze. It's clinical and very dull.
 

Mind you, I'm only basing that on photography. I haven't eaten there or seen the finished product from the inside. Still, I am sufficiently haughty and experienced enough to make half-judgements, so I shall. It just looks wrong. It's suddenly a restaurant that has been cut adrift in search of a new mooring in London's harbour of foodie ships. If you'll indulge me a final maritime metaphor, the one saving grace is that this new venture is merely a tug towing the good ship A-Z Restaurants. The parent company of 11 Park Walk also owns a host of restaurants throughout the capital. Mainly Italian affairs and quite good too, they are in a similar vein to the D&D group, but with just the one Michelin star to their name now, with Zafferano of Belgravia leading their bill.
 

When we ate at Aubergine (may it rest in peace), the four of us were fortunate enough to have half off our final bill. The American equivalent of Toptable, Opentable (which recently acquired the all-conquering Toptable from the UK), happened to mention in an e-mail to me that Aubergine were taking 50% off their dinner menu in the week, so we went for it. One final side note before the meal: Opentable is not a particularly impressive website. Lacking all the user-friendly savvy of Toptable, it was more by luck than design that I came across this one. Still, thanks duly go to them for the deal.
 

We had a wonderful time at Aubergine for three reasons: 1) we did get a very reasonable dinner thanks to the offer; 2) the food is – despite the loss of the Michelin Star – generally very good; and 3) service was attentive, unobtrusive and polite throughout the evening. The place itself, despite not quite needing the cuisine and furniture change it has since undergone, was a little tired. Lots of pale pink everywhere, combined with some rather school-days skylights made for a slightly bizarre surround; as if you were eating in a stunningly-furnished conservatory. So backtracking slightly, I can see why A-Z decided to change things in that sense.
 

Yet it is this clinging to the old days that really struck a chord with me about Aubergine. Sure, the décor was a bit passé, but that's almost what you want in a former grand-dame of Chelsea's restaurant family. It was reminiscent of the heady days of the past two decades, a subdued lushness that doesn't really sit right, but hey – we're in Chelsea so we'd better sit up straight and enjoy it kind of a feel. There is a lot of pronounced restaurant history within these walls. In 1993, this is where Gordon Ramsay really caught his break. The restaurant was re-opened with him in his first head chef role, under the patronage of Marco Pierre White, where he went on to win his first two Michelin Stars by 1997. The weight of history rests heavy: I recently had a chat with a restauranteur, chef and culinary veteran who was telling me he still remembered every detail of a meal he ate at Aubergine many years ago.

They were still hitting some silky highs when we ate there. The pre-course canapés were a slick combination of spiced carrot purée and tomato with cheese and onion on little crackers. Pre-starters like these can often be irrelevances to the meal, but these just about did the job. Tasty morsels that were beautifully presented (left). Before we got stuck in, the staff showed they were on the ball by offering to turn down the air conditioning as they could see that two of our number were a little chilly. In a near-empty restaurant, this should be a given, but these touches always help.
 

Starters bucked a recent trend in that they weren't quite as good as the rest of the meal. Too many times in recent months I've been wowed by the starter then left a little cold by the following courses. In an ideal world you want all three to be great, but rarely do we get this. Not to say Aubergine's starters were bad though. Some scallops with tomato (or sauce vierge) were fresh enough and whilst unspectacular they did go down well.
 

Mike and I went for some meatier options. The duck salad Mike ordered was summery in the extreme, littered with fresh vegetables and adorned with tomato. A showy starter for sure but nicely varied, with nearly raw smoked duck combining well with the soft and crispy vegetables. My criticism would be that it was a little muddled, and distinctive flavours were tricky to pick out at times. Duck this good deserves impeccable support.

I opted for something I felt would be right on the mark at Aubergine: marbled foie gras terrine with cherries and brioche (right). The stuff was predictably glorious; as I suspected, whatever has robbed the place of their Michelin star, it ain't the paté. Sharp and sour cherries were a great accompaniment to the rough brioche and smooth terrine. Lovely.
 

Main courses were a better-rounded affair across the board other than the lamb with olives. This is something I've tried a couple of times and perhaps it's just my aversion to olives in general, but I'm of the opinion that the two do not mix. In the event, the stuffed saddle of lamb was a bit of a mess. Haphazardly layered with a couple of display wafers stuck in the top to make it look as if the dish was wearing bunny ears, I wasn't a fan. A shame indeed, because the lamb was deliciously well-cooked.



If lamb, a classic favourite of mine, let us down, something which surprised in no small measure was a divine fillet of seabass, served with tomato concassé (essentially rough-diced and fried tomatoes) and parmesan shortbread (left). Allowing for such absurdly-named fare as parmesan shortbread, the dish was a real winner. Cooked to a fall-apart T, the fish had been combined with its accompaniments to expert standards. I was definitely surprised, but there is so much to be said for great combinations. (Even if they do describe anything as pretentiously as parmesan shortbread.)

Mike and I decided to share something we were certain would bring home the bacon for our main course: a cote de boeuf with bearnaise sauce and vegetables (right). Indeed, the piece of beef was top-notch. Cooked rare, drizzled with a dark jus and all the correct trimmings (though this sort of thing usually comes with chips, I was more than happy with our roasted vegetable sides), we were seriously satisfied. You can't write an awful lot more about something which you expected to be good and it was. Consider it a generous hat-tip for Aubergine to deliver us a classic.
 

Desserts in a decent French restaurant are always worth the few weeks off the end of your life, so we indulged in more or less the most stereotypical way we could: with a creme brulée, a soufflé and a tarte tatin. All three were lovely. The creme brulée was well-received by the other half, who is nothing short of a creme brulée connoisseur these days (left). One small criticism was that they'd over-sugared the top.

Mike's cherry soufflé was a real winner (right). Served with a scoop of ice cream, the fruit flavours were perfectly complimented by the sweet chill. Perhaps not quite up to Le Gavroche standards a few weeks prior, but we'd never expect that. However, yet another French standard expertly presented.

Finally, my apple tart was quite as it should have been: buttery, crisp and chock full of body-creaking goodness (left). I do love me a good tarte tatin and this was. Dollop of ice cream on the top and the job was most impressively done.

Desserts were a fairly accurate representation of the meal: French standards, delivered at a competitively high level. There were two things that struck me about the experience overall: first, that I might have been slightly miffed paying full price, which is never a good sign. Second, that it may well be the simple Gallic cuisine which characterised Aubergine's class for so long is no longer what deserves Michelin stars.

Writing about Aubergine seems not much more than glossy nostalgia at this point, particularly given how much I have written. I'll stand by it though. I was happy to have tried Aubergine whilst it still existed (though there is something of a distant relative in Buckinghamshire) because it is somewhere that stood for quite some time as a constant in London's culinary milieu. Whether 11 Park Walk turns out to be a master stroke or a failure, I'll always think Aubergine went too soon.



11 Park Walk (formerly Aubergine)

Sunday 12 December 2010

Archipelago – Fitzrovia, Wednesday 21st July, 2010

In the name of self-effacing self-promotion, I was recently on a couple of episodes of Market Kitchen, a show on the Good Food Channel. I talked about food from Cheshire with studio guests and it was a lot of fun. Unfortunately I have not yet seen the footage since I don't subscribe to the channel and a friend's Sky+ box broke down. Sufficed to say I was fantastic, delivering sharp and pithy comments with a grace belying my relative broadcasting inexperience. Well, I enjoyed it anyway.

The producer of the show asked me a few questions so they could set up a profile about me before I went on the show. One of the questions asked was about the strangest food I'd eaten. Without hesitation I answered "locusts and grasshoppers." Definitely bizarre foods that I wouldn't have expected to eat a few years ago. But I have now. And I ate them at Archipelago in the west end. I even talked to the show's host Penny Smith about this between takes. Another day in the life of a critic…

A friend hosted a dual-birthday meal at Archipelago back in July, so Mike, the other half and I all attended, desperate to see what the relative fuss about this place was, and if they could justify the hype they've managed to generate through serving things like insects and other whacky foreign fare.

I will start with the good things about the place. It's in a lovely area – just south of Warren Street station which is a gorgeous mix of expensive flats, proper pubs and charismatic media offices. It was also a lovely summery evening which is a great time to be out and eating with friends. It's a friendly place – sort of like an outrageously over-the-top nautical shop by the sea feel to it – which makes you feel very relaxed and carefree.

Good things out of the way, I have to say Archipelago let me (and, I get the feeling, not just me) down. It is supremely tacky. That's the problem with the nautical shop: whilst it's relaxing on the one hand, it's also horrendously cheap-looking. I can live with cheap-looking if it's cheap pricing: Archipelago has one but not the other. The food is massively overpriced. They will probably say this is a result of huge importing costs incurred through shipping crocodile, kangaroo and suchlike into their kitchen, which is fine… if it is worth it.

And here is my real beef with Archipelago. I could tolerate the décor, the prices and the frankly inattentive staff if the food on the table was up to the mark. Canapés were fun bits of splodge on dry bread which weren't unnecessary and actually promised much, but things quickly snapped into focus with the starters. Some duck salad was so blandly uninspiring that it didn't deserve to be on any menu, let alone an exotic one. Vine leaf-wrapped crocodile meat was interesting, I'll say that much (left). Not necessarily good or bad, it was a bit fatty and chewy, whilst never delivering the sort of flavoursome punch I would expect of such a meat. Very meaty shellfish is what I got from it.

On to main courses, the marquee dish was clearly the marsupial which they had added a £5 supplement to for some reason or another, none of which I could pick out from the dish itself (right). Half grilled and half slathered in sauce, the complete flavour of the meat itself was reduced to something close to chicken with a fruitier aftertaste. Overall, not really worth it.

The second main course was laughable in having any pretensions to being special, fresh or exotic. Branded as essentially a posh chicken curry with rice, it was essentially an average chicken curry with rice. I don't really understand what this mildly sauced, uninteresting pile of (allegedly) Indonesian food was doing on the menu, on my plate or in this restaurant.

Possibly the most over-priced thing on the menu was the Love-Bug Salad, which is where my grasshoppers and whatnot came from. I suppose you do expect to pay a bit more for such outlandish fare, but when you try it and it tastes of burn corn husks with chilli and garlic, you feel as if you've fallen for a scam and a half.

Not content with copping out for just about the whole of the meal so far, Archipelago decided to let us down with desserts too. The Colombian Fix sounded interesting. It was billed as 'serious therapy for the chocoholic'; also interesting. It was a chocolate fondant which contained nothing special or different, bar the bitter cocoa flavourings they had overdone the (chocolate) sauce with. It seems that Archipelago divide their time between ruining classics, bumbling their way through anything remotely unique and charging whatever they can get away with.

The other two dessert events were a chocolate-covered scorpion, which would have actually looked impressive enough but for their small size (left). Mike ranted for a good while about the size of scorpion he expected for £6.50. A Visit From The Doctor was something we ordered for the birthday boys, and it turned out to be a couple of shots of deathly strong, absurdly flavoured liqueurs. Lots of fun, and even the non-alcoholic that I am could see the point in this one.

Not content with taking us to the cleaners on the final bill (crocodile, kangaroo and scorpion would cost you £40 before service or drinks), Archipelago obviously felt one last squeeze was in order. At the bottom of the menu, they write 'Many items in the restaurant are for sale'. You're not kidding: I can practically feel the careers of everyone at Archipelago aching to be bought up and sold off.


Archipelago

Wednesday 1 December 2010

Corrigan’s Mayfair – Mayfair, Sunday 18th July, 2010

Richard Corrigan is the Irish-born brains behind two of London's most coveted restaurants in recent times; Lindsay House and Bentley's Oyster Bar And Grill. I sampled the latter just over a year ago and was horrified at their set menu; more and more I feel as if it was an off day, though I've not yet braved a return there. Lindsay House was an 11-year long Michelin-starred gem in Romily Street in Soho (I hear), but Corrigan then moved to Mayfair in 2008, taking Lindsay House's guestbook and his name with him.

Moving to Mayfair, the west end or west London is a big step. Moving from Soho to Mayfair is akin to buying a new house five minutes from your existing place because the area has become a bit grubby and a family you don't like the look of has moved in three doors down. It's almost going against the current back-to-the-roots, food-from-the-market trend Britain is apparently supposed to be on. However, whilst you can take the restaurant into Mayfair, you can't take co. Meath out of the lad from Ireland.

What you need to know about Richard Corrigan is that he is respected in London. Whilst I've not seen it, he's given tremendous credit for re-introducing London to the oyster bar after his work at Bentley's. He's worked at a variety of places in London which began with a stint down in Fulham in the mid-nineties, and from then until Lindsay House closed down, he'd held that one Michelin star. The great thing about being a one-star chef – and believe me, I am saying this in the most sincere and respectful sense – is that everyone won't feel compelled to call you overrated and you'll still be able to attract the vast majority of the restaurant-going public. One-star is the way forward. (Okay, perhaps that last bit was tongue-in-cheek.)

Corrigan's Mayfair does not (yet) have one star. I think it probably will have in a few months, which brings me nicely to business: it's lovely. As I mentioned, Richard Corrigan is a no-nonsense seasonal British man. In Mayfair, that is a rare commodity. It's a stone's throw from Le Gavroche, down the road from Claridge's and within shouting distance of half a dozen other fine modern European eateries. Still, I defy you to find a better upmarket weekend roast than the one you can get on the Sunday set menu at Corrigan's.

We started things in a simplistic and stylish manner befitting the restaurant: a couple of oysters (left). These babies were every bit the genuine article: big, fresh, impressive. As I have touched on before, one oyster is enough for me and these two served as a great start to our meal.

On to more substantial matters, the country terrine we chose as one of our starters was just as it should be: feisty liver flavours reigned in by a slight and desirable roughness. Fig and date chutney on the side complimented it perfectly. More impressive and substantial were some crubeens (right). Served with crunchy pickled carrots, creamy horseradish and smooth ham, they were a huge success. Not dissimilar to the ones we tried at Launceston Place a few months earlier, these were smaller and slightly more understated. Nothing lost though: they were just lovely.

We were determined to get us a fair bit of Sunday lunchtime meat for our main courses, so we plumped for the rib of beef which, whilst incurring a £10 supplement, was quite the correct choice (left). Carved at the table (and as rare as we had asked for), served with a traditional (and perfect) Yorkshire pudding and a generous dollop of horseradish cream, this was seriously fine roast beef on a Sunday. Tender, juicy, intensely meaty and well supported.

The Elwy Valley lamb we went for was not as impressive, but presented impeccably (right). Dressed with greens and liberally accompanied with broad beans and peas, the meat was spot on (rare enough) and a slightly lighter alternative to the butch beef. Two slices of a rack and juicy as anything, this worked perfectly as a second dish. My only criticism of the mains was the slightly underwhelming nature of the side dishes: potatoes that are little dry do precisely nothing for me and the green beans weren't up to much. Lovely carrots though.

Desserts were as down to earth and richly fulfilling as the rest of the meal had been. If you serve something as simple as a chocolate brownie in a decent restaurant, it must be a fantastic brownie or have some sort of inventive twist. This had shades of the former and much of the latter: sour cherry ice cream proved to be an unlikely winner of an accompaniment.

More in-season and on the money was a delicious rhubarb parfait (left). Served with vanilla ice cream which was soft enough not to overwhelm the dish and some strawberries for appearances, it was just what I needed after such a meaty and filling first couple of courses. Rhubarb desserts in spring and summer are what make seasonal desserts worthwhile.

I can't really say much more about Corrigan's Mayfair: it is a surprisingly down to earth restaurant of the moment in a glorious area usually famed for upmarket French food. As I intimated earlier, I will be surprised if we don't see a Michelin star here next year. Three courses for less than £30 of this quality is nothing to be sniffed at and everything to be applauded. I'll be back here for sure.


Corrigan's Mayfair

Saturday 20 November 2010

The Clarendon – Notting Hill, Tuesday 14th July 2010

In the world of food, the margins by which good and bad ideas are defined can be extraordinarily thin. You only have to read any seasoned reviewer venting about how a restaurant has trashed their menu with unnecessary ingredients to appreciate this. In the world of fine dining – or even good dining – anyone serving food has to get the specifics just right to deliver. This is the problem food critics suffer from. One tiny flaw in a book or a film can easily be lost in the work, but in food, you have to look out for everything.

Of course, sometimes restaurants make it remarkably easy for you by fouling up the whole thing completely. Not too long ago, I was in a hotel restaurant in Brighton where I was unfortunately subjected to some of the very worst food it has ever been my misfortune to eat. You occasionally get food which looks like it has been kept under a heat lamp for a while. This stuff tasted like it had been cooked under a lamp from start to finish. There are a few reasons I only focus on London eating with this blog, one of them being that I don't get around outside London enough to warrant a broad enough spread of reviews, but if I did I would be sure to give this particular restaurant the panning it deserves.

The other extreme is where everything is just about perfect and it all works. I feel a bit guilty writing a perfect review (there haven't been many), but it rarely happens so I suppose we don't need to worry about that. The rest of the time, we pick through everything to find flaws amongst great works, flies in the ointment, plastic in the dessert (which has actually happened to me) and so on…

As happens so often in life, I turn to the stunning Frasier to illustrate a point. The perversity of the critic is summed up perfectly by a quote from Kelsey Grammar's character: "what is the one thing better than an exquisite meal..? An exquisite meal with one tiny flaw we can pick at all night."

Back in July I had stopped in at the relatively new Clarendon in Notting Hill, which is branded as "Holland Park and Notting Hill's newest pub, cocktail lounge bar and restaurant." I was already wary of the place with a description like that; they were clearly running the gamete with their introduction. However, it was a Taste London offer, so a friend (whom I owed a meal) and I went in for dinner.

The evening was a cavalcade of small flaws which brought the whole thing down. The first problem with The Clarendon is that it suffers from the same malady as Paradise By Way Of Kensal Green: it doesn't know what it's trying to be. You can tell from the description above (from their website, I might add) that they're trying to cover all the bases, which does not work in general. What you usually get is typified with The Clarendon: a hollow hall of confused nothingness. Which is a real shame because their main room is quite pretty in an earthy way.

The starter I sampled was a double-mistake. Mixing chorizo with scallops is a bad idea. Particularly when the chorizo is as dry as jerky and the scallops have been more or less bunged on the plate with little work. I'm all for simplicity and letting ingredients speak for themselves, but when you're preparing food so clumsily it doesn't work.

We split a chateaubriand for the main course which looked impressive but didn't deliver. Served with a roasted head of garlic, a deluge of red wine sauce and some mushrooms, it should've been fantastic. Instead it was a waste of steak and just about everything else on the plate. Average quality meat, poorly seasoned sauces and very uninspired on all counts. And that really is a shame, considering you're shelling out £45 for this. (You do get two sides with the dish, which is a nice touch, but even then they weren't up to much.)

A passable if dry sticky toffee pudding later and we were ready to settle up the bill. This seemed to require the energy and attention of every single member of the waiting staff and maybe even the manager. I don't know if they'd ever seen a Taste London card before but they appeared pretty baffled by it. Fortunately, we sloped off only having to pay half what the food was worth: I'd have baulked at having to pay full price.

So, far from being a critic's dream, this was closer to a consumer's nightmare. Enticing offers, lengthy introductions and snazzy faux-traditional dining rooms are only good if you're backing it up with real quality on the plate. The Clarendon is falling away here and it is not going to stand the test of time unless it bucks its ideas up. They have a reasonable location, a lovely building and one of the nicest areas in London in which to ply their trade. It's now up to them to get busy making it fulfil its potential.


The Clarendon

Sunday 7 November 2010

A Dream Realised: Le Gavroche – Mayfair, Friday 2nd July, 2010

They say you should never meet your idols. And of course, "they" have a point. As soon as you realise the natural flaws and failings of something or someone that you have built up to an improbable and impossible degree it all falls apart. I have had the same thing in some cases with restaurants before. Maybe you should never eat your idols. Does that work?

I had wanted to go to Le Gavroche for years. Literally. It had been more or less at the top of my London list for as long as I've been writing this blog. The risk of wanting something this badly is that it goes one of two ways: either it doesn't live up to your expectations (never eat your idols, as they might one day say); or you're just so determined it's going to be perfect that it is.

The chef patron of Le Gavroche is one rather famous Michel Roux Jr. He's more out and about than actually cooking in the kitchen these days, yet whilst his recent and frequent turns on Masterchef : The Professionals have detracted slightly from his work (yet improved his celebrity cache), the guy clearly knows flavour, style and how to construct a menu. The signature dishes and quality at his restaurant have near lead the way in London for years now. Suited and booted, late in the evening, ready to be impressed, in we went.

I loved Le Gavroche. Right down to its ludicrously plush carpets and piss-weak lighting. (Yes, I know all about terrible lighting, but it worked here.) I'm writing this review with an even more biased slant than usual (it was a birthday gift for me and I wasn't paying), but I was always going to enjoy this one. So, even down to the lighting, the evening was a success. But not a total one. Here's why…

There are several reasons to like Le Gavroche instantly. It is magnificently decorated, superbly furnished, opulently styled, yet somehow understated. Despite all the gloss on the surface, there is something rather modest about its manner and pace. There is a second reason for this: the staff. I was talking to a friend shortly before the meal who told me "there are staff everywhere…but you won't notice them." A remarkably pithy and precise comment. There are indeed staff fluttering about, yet in such an unobtrusive way that you don't always notice they're there. After food quality, service is everything and Le Gavroche delivers on priority two with aplomb.

Food-wise, the thing you remember from Le Gavroche above all else is they don't hold back. They do not stop feeding you. It's a seamless procession of pre- and post-courses which nearly meld into one massive experience. I say "nearly" because it isn't quite as smooth as it could be. We nearly lost out on one of our pre-starters as it was about to be taken away before we had finished it. Even so, the quality of these morsels in general was excellent. Bits of foie gras and cold fish, all on the mark.

On to the business of the meal proper, there were soaring highs and average middles. The starters were two of those said highs. Despite the moderately decadent nature of the restaurant, sometimes there's a lot to be said for simple, seasonal quality. And our first starter was a model of such features. Egg yolk and pea ravioli (one of the former, two of the latter) along with chicken wings and asparagus sounds all over the place. It looked it too, slightly (left). However, the texture and formation of the pasta was perfect, and everything was cooked right. I struggled a little at first, but the final bite, combining all elements of the dish - the fresh peas with the smooth pureé, the in-season asparagus, the salty chicken and the silky yolk - showed how local, seasonal and elegant are a stunning distillation of tastes and ideas.

The second starter, however, was something absolutely opulently French. A richer-than-rich combination of strong, bold and brash flavours, our mousse of chicken with foie gras atop a slice of artichoke, decorated with truffles was heart-stopping in more than just the literal sense (right). The deliciously fluffy and smooth liver mousse was exceptional with the perfectly-cooked artichoke base. Within lurked two slabs of seared foie gras which you could actually pick out amongst the bolder flavours of the dish; no mean combination. Slivers of truffle adorned the dome of mousse along with a rich jus, which eventually slid the whole affair into a gorgeous first course.

Our main courses were leaning towards the slightly more decadent side of things once again. A rare steak with foie gras was just about what you expect: rich, moist, dressed well… and served with crisps (left). Surprising for sure but generally speaking it was good. You can't say a lot more than that, because the individual parts of the dish were less pronounced than the starters and it was less spectacular in general. However, the one area of the plate which pushed the dish into culinary overdrive was the truffled hollandaise sauce: exactly as wonderful as it sounds.

The roast saddle of rabbit with parmesan and potatoes was lovely (right). The rabbit was stunningly well-cooked and combined with the potatoes and other miscellaneous vegetables. I must admit I do love the nature of classic French food in this respect: vegetables are only there to make up the numbers. The strangest parts of the dish were the accompaniments to the rabbit. The potatoes had been strung out, knitted into the thinnest chips you've ever seen and were a deliciously crunchy contrast to the soft rabbit and smooth sauce. The parmesan was crisp-fried into what I can only describe as a hat, which topped off the dish in eccentric but satisfying fashion. It was a dish of the most fanciful comfort food you could wish to eat.

By this stage, we were fairly stuffed in terms of both the richness and volume of food, but the non-stop nature of the evening continued. We were each presented with a long glass boat containing fruit jellies, macaroons and impressive sugar work. Unnecessary, lavish, sweet and quite pleasant: welcome to desserts.

Puddings came in the form of one which was far too complicated and didn't live up to the evening's standards and one which was superb. The former was a dégustation aux framboises or an assortment of raspberries to you and me (left). This sounded impressive but eventually failed to deliver on two fronts. The soufflé was miniature and tasty, the sorbet was fresh and zingy, but the rest wasn't up to snuff. The mille-feuille of chocolate and raspberries was neither luxuriant enough to allow the chocolate to flourish, nor inventive enough to really taste the raspberries. The doughnut served with raspberry sauce was something of a nuisance. They might have been better just giving us a decent-sized raspberry soufflé with sorbet.

Soufflé, it turns out, is one of Le Gavroche's strengths. As well it might be, given how whole-heartedly true to France it is. The passion fruit and white chocolate soufflé made up for more or less any shortcomings with the raspberries (right). Served hot at the table with a fresh passion fruit sauce, then extravagantly topped with a sublime white chocolate ice cream, it was just about the best soufflé I have eaten.

And so it was... I will say right now that Le Gavroche didn't completely live up to my expectations. And that's why eating your idols is bad. However, for the most part it was a very enjoyable meal, served expertly and tasting stellar at times. The only dish that could be described as average was the raspberry dessert, whereas more or less everything else was exceptional.

There is one thing that stuck in my craw though: price. As I said before I wasn't paying, but I did happen to catch a glance at the priced menu a couple of times. I do think the food is overpriced. For example, if you wanted lobster mousse to start, that would cost you nearly £60. Now I realise that a dish as magnificent as lobster mousse will always cost a lot, but consider the addition to your total meal cost with that. And the mark-up on your service charge. Le Gavroche might be a wonderful dinner, but your bank balance will know about it afterwards.

Miserly moaning out of the way, I did have a wonderful time at the London restaurant I had coveted longest. The evening was lovely, the service was great, the food was (for the most part) delicious and the place itself is superbly impressive. An institution for sure; one that deserves to continue to stand the test of time.


Le Gavroche

Tuesday 26 October 2010

Wahaca White City – Shepherds Bush Thursday 24th June, 2010

I'd heard good things about the cheap, streetwise glory surrounding Wahaca for some time, so when I met up with a couple of friends for dinner there I was hoping for some heart and soul with my Mexican food. I wanted to taste the passion and spice that makes Central American food so lustily demanded in America and so fashionably lauded over here.

It might be no surprise to hear that I did not find it in a packed Westfield eatery. (Nice try with 'White City', Wahaca.) I suppose that's implied by the words "Westfield Eatery", though I have enjoyed the odd enjoyable meal there before. There is something that's quite nice about the Southern Terrace at Westfield, with its attempts at greenery and straight-from-Asia water features (though in Asia they'd be cleaner), especially on a summer evening. There are loads of people about and the mood is good.

Wahaca wasn't a disaster, but the place just doesn't deliver the sort of thrilling food you want it to. We sampled a variety of dishes which ranged from good to below average, but the feel of the place is not a satisfying one. Strangely, our waitress suggested that we'd asked for too much to eat, so we might want to consider dropping a dish. Now, firstly I do admire the honesty; not many places would encourage you to eat less. However, I don't think it was necessarily true – I could've eaten more but then again I am rather greedy. The drinks were terrible. I wish places would start offering more interesting ideas for non-drinkers than virgin mojitos. (I was not massively enthused by hibiscus water or horchata – rice milk?! – either.)

The other problem I have with this meal is that it left no impression on me whatsoever. I can't fully recall what I ate there. Yes, a lot of this is due to my tardiness; it's something like four months since I actually ate the meal. Still, if food is good enough, it usually leaves some sort of positive impression. There was some pork, some cod, some chicken, all served in or with a variety of Mexican carbo-fare: quesadillas, tortillas and rice. I won't complain about it, but neither will I praise it.

There isn't much more to say about Wahaca. It's convenience food that's a few notches above Nando's but not half as fun as it could be. But then again, the model that they have employed at Westfield is one that will make them a lot of money without breaking a lot of sweat. I won't go back to their White City branch, but there just might be something to be said for their flagship venue in Covent Garden.


Wahaca

Sunday 24 October 2010

Criterion – Piccadilly, Sunday 20th June, 2010

You know Criterion, even if you think you don't. You've walked past it but might not have recognised it when you did. If you've ever walked through Piccadilly Circus, you will have seen it. It's situated in the huge building right off the main pedestrian area of the place. It's been there forever, gone through a few facelifts in its time (Marco Pierre White used to have a place there) and generally is as much a rightful part of the area as the Trocadero.

Unfortunately, it's about as useful as the Trocadero too, which is to say it looks faintly impressive, attracts interest with ease but delivers annoying fluff and nonsense. The dining room is grandiose and pleasant, but that's all you can say really. When the food gets put in front of you, it all melts away into a void of hollow west end faff.

The Sunday lunch the other half and I sampled was, for the most part, lousy. The one shimmering beacon of acceptability was the first course. Oysters were fresh and tasted as they should (left). The expert dissection across the table was indicative that these weren't to be derided, and the glorious plop that was sent my way was good enough for me. I ordered the foie gras with wood pigeon, atop brioche with some dressings. Now, this dish should be magnificent. What I got was not. I don't know how it's possible to make foie gras taste cheap and un-worldly but Criterion managed it. The pigeon wasn't bad in the event, but the sauce (apple and tomato relish) was far too sweet and detracted from the main events. I enjoyed the first bite, doubted the second and was indifferent to the rest.

Main courses were a pretty hilarious failure. At least they would've been to people that were watching us. And I don't know who would've been: the place wasn't exactly brimming. We went for pork shoulder with potatoes and veg along with the asparagus risotto with summer truffle. I wish I could've just left it at reading those two dishes on the menu and let my imagination feed me. They were both poor.

Great Sunday meat should come in the form of very simple, rich and tasty hunks of local fare. It should be earthy, warm, reminiscent of childhood and basically do everything that modern eating society demands of English food. If it's good. Like Quo Vadis, for example. That was good Sunday meat. This was a joke by comparison. Unspeakably dry, tasteless pork served with potatoes that had been salted, prepared and cooked to death. Each step in their journey to the plate had been a way to make them awful.

Asparagus and goat's curd risotto with summer truffle should be just about the best thing you can eat in late June. The two key ingredients are in season and this should be corking all over. Nothing about it was good. Not a single thing. From the over-filled plate to the over-cooked asparagus (which wasn't too fresh anyway) to the terrible texture, I hated it. This is classic evidence of a simple dish that has been ruined to the point of no merit at all. It wasn't even over-complicated, just bad. I asked where the summer truffle was, because it sure wasn't on the plate. The waitress was suitably confused by my request, but emerged with a small dish of something which I had to sprinkle over the food.

I had a slight issue with this, since adding one of the main ingredients to a dish is something the kitchen should do. And they shouldn't forget about it either. But hey, I had my truffle and that can improve any dish. Well, if it's fresh. If it has been freshly grated or flaked on to, or in to, the dish, punctuating it with sweet, spicy bursts of glorious flavour, then yes, it will do just fine. This, however, was not truffle. Maybe it had been truffle last summer, but it seemed to have been shoved in a cupboard and lain dormant for a season before becoming petrified and losing all of its flavour. This dish of toenails that I sprinkled all over the plate certified the lunch time disaster.

Dessert couldn't save the day. Serving something called 'deconstructed rhubarb crumble' is a bold and daring statement. You have to firstly justify serving something so pompous and secondly quantify why such a ridiculous name has been given to the dish. In case you're wondering, Criterion did neither. It could've worked if it had been billed as 'summer rhubarb', but oh no; this wasn't a deconstructed crumble - it was a waste of rhubarb. Under-cooked, poorly-flavoured and not dressed as it should've been, I didn't enjoy it much.

The other half went for a chocolate tart which they would have been really hard pressed to mess up. Try as they might, they got us back on to the plateau of averageness that we had been gasping for ever since our mains came out. It wasn't bad, but that's the best compliment you could give it.

So, don't bother with Criterion. I don't want to sound unnecessarily harsh, but when a restaurant attempts to confound all your expectations and let you down at every turn, you don't really want to champion much about them. Let's leave this magnificent hall to a venture more deserving of its glory.


Criterion

Taste Of London – Regents Park, Saturday 19th June

Well, summer really is in full swing. Taste of London is a wonderful event in the London food calendar, and one that I hope I will be able to attend as long as it remains interesting. Since last year, my tastes have changed a little, but the appeal of the event is twofold: sample some dishes that have previously hit the spot, plus try a few new things too. The hopeful upshot..? A load of places get added to the 'to visit' list and a great day had by all.

This year, the organisers had obviously cottoned on to the fact that if they split up the allotted time available into separate sessions, they would make more money and sell more tickets. So myself and two others went for the afternoon session on the Saturday to hopefully sample the best London had to offer.

The day (or afternoon) as a whole was enjoyable and eye-opening. Unfortunately, London's classic fickle weather didn't bestow us with the sun-drenched glory of yesteryear, so eating a variety of dishes in the wind and rain of a gloomy June day didn't have the same appeal. However, we weren't about to shy away from some good eats, so off we went in search of food.

It's always helpful if you can start a day of eating off with a bang, so when we managed to experience two quick high points at the beginning of the event, things looked good. We immediately headed for a throng of visitors surrounding the Trinity stand and realised that they were serving their signature pigs trotter dish (left). Served well diced with gribiche sauce (fancy pickle mayonnaise, really) along with a quail egg and crackling, it was definitely worth the extra crowns and the slightly long wait.

Whilst all this queueing was going on, we spread the net a little wider to gather another three dishes to start the day with. Trinity was also offering the more standard pork belly (right), which was correctly seasoned, accompanied and served, even though the crackling was a little hard. We also stopped in at L'Anima's stand for some rabbit Siciliana (above left). This was delicious - well-stewed rabbit meat served with a rich, luxurious tomato sauce which was punctuated with delicious sweet, tart shallots. A fine dish and no mistake.

Having munched our way through a fairly rich set of first courses, we gave our bodies no rest at all and hit Fino for a double-whammy of some rather fresh and tender suckling pig and some surprisingly excellent squid (left). The latter was the show-stealer, ticking all the boxes for how baby squid should taste. Often you can get rather chewy or dry stuff, but I was very grateful for my companions' insistence that we give it a go. Top stuff indeed.

We made a stop in at Tom's Kitchen, which seemed a formality after last year. Fortunately for us the foie gras and chicken liver parfait (right) was still on the menu, as well as 'seven-hour confit lamb'. Those two descriptions alone are enough to make a lavish carnivore like me salivate, and the pay-off was as expected. The two dishes did the job: the parfait in its own right as a rich, full and stunning starter; the lamb as yet another reminder of how much I want to try the kitchen, or indeed Tom Aikens' main restaurant near Sloane Square. The lamb was intensely flavoursome, coupled with sharp balsamic onions and a classic mash. We drifted back past there to complete an Aikens clean sweep later on in the day to try their Eton Mess for dessert. As it turned out, this was something of a let-down; a pale if pretty take on an English summer classic. However, the proficiency of their first two courses made the stand a winner.

We stopped in at the Launceston Place stand for their (apparently) famous goose egg and chips. Disappointing, given how good I know eggs at the restaurant are. I don't know what they'd done with this, but it tasted like smooth mayonnaise spread over overcooked chips. Perhaps this is something they'll do on their menu one day, but until then I remain unconvinced.

Theo Randall's stand made an almost-winning contribution to the day, as we tried all three of the dishes they were offering. As expected, the orgasmic chocolate cake I fawned over last year, as well as on the visit to his restaurant, was still wonderful. I believe we ate three of them by the time the day was out. We also sampled some aubergine and tomato penne, which was as you expect from Theo Randall - an exceptionally-presented, unexceptionally simple dish. Unfortunately, the pan-seared scallops with chilli and lentils served only to annoy me. Mushy, poorly-flavoured and just bad. My companions got a kick out of it, but it was not something I'd ever want to waste time on again.

What followed were two slightly less impressive takes on dishes from a year ago. Again, Le Gavroche was serving beef, but this time with polenta (left). It wasn't bad, but as with last year, you get a sense that they're just wheeling this out in their sleep. It's not a dish that made me think "I have got to get to this restaurant". I do actually think that, it's just because of reputation, as opposed to what I tried here. Similarly, the show-stealing lamb from Odette's had dropped from last year. Still served with peas and mint, the dish had lost some of its impressive smoothness and finesse (above right).

After a short break for a juice cocktail and the nice surprise of bumping into a couple of other friends, we headed for the Grill at the Dorchester. Now I usually have to remind myself that this is comfortably apart from Alain Ducasse's venture at the same hotel, but even so I was looking forward to sampling what they had to offer. There was average and there was spectacular. The former was some fairly undersold lamb with tomatoes and shallot pureé. Even if the Odette's dish wasn't quite up to 2009 standards, it still knocked spots off this one. However, the other dish we sampled was quite simply one of the very best of the day. Sardine pie with scallop sounded amazing, looked amazing and tasted outrageous (above left). Flaky, buttery pastry with sharp, salty sardine, complimented perfectly with the sweet, warm scallop on the side. Cauliflower pureé too, which adds pizazz to any dish. The Grill is now on my list after a dish this good.

As we surveyed the festival and our watches, we realised that we'd eaten just about all we could - in terms of capacity and available funds - so we turned our minds to desserts. We still had room to revisit Theo's delectable cakes and Tom's average Eton Mess as I mentioned earlier, but we also discovered a couple of stunners to see us off. We wandered back past L'Anima to try their Delizia de Limone, which was less the classic lemon tart I'd anticipated and more a delightfully crumbly mess of a dish (right). By no means a pick of the day, but very enjoyable nonetheless, and a classic summer dessert to boot.

We saved two of the best for last. Whilst the Maze stand hadn't captured our imagination with it's first two courses, the dessert choice of strawberry cheesecake was sufficient to tempt us. And it looked ridiculous (left). A frankly unnecessary and pretentious re-working of a classic dessert. I thought. I was wrong. The choice of sprinkling the base crumbs over the top of wonderfully creamy, thick cheese, then lacing the whole thing with fresh strawberries, strawberry sauce and a sheet of strawberry sugar was perfect. We ate three of them overall. It's a good job we hadn't found them sooner because we might've spent even more of our day eating them if we had. The final piece of the day was a simply superb custard tart from Rhodes 24 (above right). Served with a gloriously dark and sweet raisin syrup, the smoothness of the dessert was sensationally complimented. A top dessert to close the afternoon.

So that's what we tried. And we were highly satisfied. It was a lovely day, despite the driving wind and occasional rain. If you have any sort of interest in food, events or what's out there in London, fork out £40 or £50 next year and have four hours of fun in Regents Park. As for a menu of the day... Well, it's really difficult this year, because there were a good few stand out dishes and very little I didn't like. However, the pressure is on, so here's what I'm going for:

Starter: Scallop and Sardine Pie from the Grill at the Dorchester. Maybe not a starter in the conventional sense, but it worked wonderfully well for me and I would love to eat this at the start of a meal.

Main Course: Pigs Trotters from Trinity. Give me trotters with quail egg and sauce gribiche any day and I will be a happy man. The dish was a winner.

Dessert: Chocolate Cake from Theo Randall. Sorry, but I won't budge on this one: the very best there is. Despite a huge effort from the Maze cheesecake and the Rhodes custard tart, nothing can knock my appreciation from the Theo torte.


Taste Of London

Friday 22 October 2010

The Ladbroke Arms – Holland Park, Saturday 24th April 2010

I was talking to a friend recently about great food pubs and subsequently wanted to refer them to my meal at The Ladbroke Arms. I then realised I'd written the review and forgotten to publish it. And given that the damned review was late in the first place, I'm not massively proud of myself here. Even so, I think it's worth reading about.

As a group meal (and one with special significance), I had hoped to get a three-way review of the place, but alas I cannot extract words from my colleagues. However, I am still full of opinion, prose and food, so I will do my best as ever.

Tom had been championing the Ladbroke Arms for as long as I’ve known him, which made it a place we needed to try. The three of us plus the other half met up for some lunch on a beautiful sunny Saturday. The place is every bit a traditional London gastropub: wood everywhere, big windows, classic bar and tall ceilings.

The ordering system at the place is a bit bizarre. Each table is applied a number which gets written on a chalkboard which gets noted down by the one food waiter they have there which gets attended to in the order it was written which then gets ordered and scrawled off the chalkboard which then means the next number will be seen to. Got it..? What it basically means is that you may need to prepare for a long wait for your food. Fortunately, the place is pleasant enough that you don’t mind a bit of a wait. The downside is if you turn up at 1, you might not be eating until nearer 3.

When our food eventually arrived, it was by and large very good. The upsides were a selection of very fresh langoustines with mayonnaise, some divine warm duck salad, a beautiful piece of steak and some sumptuous pork stew.

The stew and the steak were both cooked to a T: that is to say the former mixed falling-apart chunks of pork with steaming broth, served with turnip dauphinoise (left). If I find one dish this year that illustrates how wonderful English food still is, this might well be it. The latter was properly rare, smothered with garlic butter and served with some lovely home-cooked chips. I want my steak like this all the time.

The langoustines were delicious and so very English: cold, sharp (literally: I cut myself getting into some of the shells) and served with mayonnaise (right). This is something the British are good at: making very fancy food seem accessible and basic. It’s unpretentious and so it should be. The duck salad was just how duck should be served in the summer: red, thinly sliced, atop mixed leaves and with a poached egg. Anything that makes duck look as healthy and pretty as this is alright in my book.

The less impressive parts of the meal were some exquisitely buttery scallops that were ruined with their accompaniment of too much chicory – a fairly pointless sideshow at the best of times. A salmon terrine was unspectacular and packed with capers, some sausages with cous cous weren’t too bad, but, come on… cous cous? Some tagliatele with mussels and chorizo should’ve been wonderful but wasn’t quite there. A bit too salty and under-dressed (the downside of British takes on foreign food), it didn’t capture the senses as it could’ve.

Desserts were as we’d hoped: just right. Parts of it weren’t for me: the sorbet was sorbet, and that doesn’t cut it as a dessert in general. The sticky toffee pudding was too dry and was covered with nuts which was a shame. However, the chocolate fondant was rich, dark and smooth, which is what we always hope for. Even better was a divine take on the traditional Eton Mess; meringue served with passion fruit and kiwi (left). Just stellar on a sunny Holland Park afternoon. Also, a delightful dish of smoothly punchy chocolate truffles added to our sweet teeth getting their money's worth (right).

Ups and downs then. But, as I review this meal of months ago with a fond glint in my eye, I must bring the opinions of Mike and Tom to the table. Mike claims this is the best meal he’s eaten all year. Tom claims it’s the best the three of us have had together. Whilst I may not precisely agree with what my contemporaries have to say, I don’t think their opinions are out of turn. The food is generally excellent, which makes paying that little bit more for your dishes worthwhile. The Ladbroke Arms might just be the best pure pub food I’ve ever eaten, so make of that what you will.


The Ladbroke Arms

Thursday 14 October 2010

Top 100 UK Restaurants 2010

The NRA rears its ugly head again. I'm not talking about gun nuts from America, but the National Restaurant Awards. They have seen fit to bestow us with another list which aspiring gourmands, critics and gluttons (I'm all of the above) can ponder and peruse as we set ourselves places to visit in the coming 12 months.

As usual, the full list is here, but I've picked out the London specific eateries for your pleasure. Notable changes are the huge falls from grace for Corrigan's Mayfair (shame), Bentley's Osyter Bar & Grill (good) and Tom Aikens (worrying). In general, the list seems to have been hit with big falls and substantial new entries.

The most notable newcomer is bang in at number three with Bistro Bruno Loubet of Clerkenwell shooting almost to the top of the list in its first year. Hot on its heels is Bar Boulud, the new Knightsbridge-based venture opened by world-renowned Daniel Boulud, famed for his stellar New York restaurant. Galvin La Chapelle, the not-quite-yet-last season venture of the Galvin brothers (who have three places in the list), steams in at 10 and various other notable newbies punctuate the top 100.

However, the name everyone is applauding is The Ledbury, for jumping up 30 places to number 1. The small place in Notting Hill is on my list and a review will be published here before the end of the year. It's been on the radar ever since I wandered past there by accident a couple of years back, and I hope it's every bit as glorious as its ranking suggests.

So here's to London, with over half the best restaurants in the UK within our fair city's walls. (Yes, I realise I've made some huge semantic errors there but let's assume that this list is correct and London is still walled. And fair.) There is a city of fine eating out there, not always at ludicrous prices, and it's up to us to enjoy it.

The London venues within the UK's top 100 restaurants:

14 Hix
32 Maze
39 Roka
54 Zuma
96 Koya

Sunday 10 October 2010

The Home of Social Eating – Joe Allen, Covent Garden, Sunday 30th May 2010

This piece feels like it's been a few years in the making. Joe Allen is one of the closest restaurant links to family history and current-day friendships I have. My brother celebrated many birthdays here in younger days, and more recently it has been used as a quite brilliant Christmas party venue for a group of football-playing friends. I have eaten here a lot, and I have yet to get bored of it.

All gushing aside, Joe Allen is a priceless piece of gaudy, glorious theatreland heritage. Covent Garden's fruitier side couldn't wish for a more authentic representation of its charm. It's a franchise based principally in New York, with outposts in London, Paris and Miami. But don't even think about calling it a chain. Any place that can import its own brand of American wholesomeness to London and appear to become one with its surroundings is a perfect juxtaposition if you ask me.

On the Sunday night in question, some of us had met up at a wine bar in Charing Cross (alarm bells). It had been planned that we would eat dinner there (red alert). However, we were informed that we'd missed the last serving of food, even though it was only about 7pm. (Glory be!) Suddenly, a group of around ten people needed somewhere else to eat – this was my moment! I leapt into the breach and suggested Joe Allen, given that it was ten minutes' walk away and you could get a killer burger for a tenner there.

The burger is not on the Joe Allen menu. But ask and ye shall receive. And what a burger it is too (left). Grilled properly, properly rare, served with pickles, cheese, bacon (if you want it) and onion, this is something that has to be tasted to be believed. You can get great English and European burgers if you look hard enough, but I've not tasted as good an American burger as this since I was in New York. Chips on the side are skin-on, salty and perfect.

Apart from that burger, the menu does change a bit. Printed new every day on a fresh simple paper booklet, you have two madly listed sides of paper to look through before you make your decisions on what to eat. I will break down what I recommend based on my experiences:

- Burger (see above)
- Chicken wings with blue cheese sauce and carrot: a biffing, biting starter
- Egg(s) Benedict: glorious if it's done right, and it usually is here
- Duck: a huge hit two Christmases ago, served as two cuts with some excellent potato
- Pheasant: served with game chips and not to be missed
- Cheesecake: another fixture. Creamy, baseless and superbly mild
- Chocolate cake: whichever variation they've got on, it most probably won't disappoint

So, that's my piece on what you should eat here. Now, the second reason I love the place is the amazing and completely not cheesy image. The place is underground (totally cool) and is floor-to ceiling plastered with genuine local artefacts: that is to say there are tonnes of promotional theatre posters stretching back generations all over the place. It's just perfect. You feel as if you could be in the 1930s at times – it's almost visually black and white.

So, as you can see I love the place and have yet to eat a bad meal there in around ten visits. I cannot think of a better place to get a group together and enjoy the hustle and bustle of a fine eatery in WC2. But, as ever, things aren't perfect. They do overcharge in certain places. So much so that the only great-value dish on the menu (and it's not even on the menu) is the burger. There are times I've ordered and been a touch underwhelmed at the price superseding the quality of my food. Parts of the menu are uninspired and limited. It's hard to get away from the feeling that you've somehow been drawn in by a perfectly orchestrated sting when the final bill comes.

But I'm nit-picking. Even though this piece started as a review, it's really a chance to express my deep-rooted respect and fondness for somewhere that I will continue to visit for quite some time. If you've ever been sat at a TGI Fridays with your head in your hands wishing for the real version, this is it. Get five friends together, book a table and enjoy yourself. You deserve it. We all do.


Joe Allen

A Dreaded Re-visit: Launceston Place – Kensington, Saturday 22nd May, 2010

As I have mentioned before, I'm not a huge fan of re-visiting restaurants. However, I'm actually more likely to re-visit somewhere I've had a bad experience than a good one, bizarrely. Of course, if it's a terrible restaurant serving terrible food, I'm unlikely to want to ever go back there. Yet if it's somewhere that I feel hasn't quite hit their usual benchmark, I'll be happy to give them another chance.

Launceston Place has been a bit of a black marked venue ever since last year's Restaurant Festival, when we were on the end of some of the very rudest service I'd ever experienced. It was lamented at the time – and has been extensively lamented since – that such service brought down the whole meal which, up to that point, had been excellent.

So how could I not go back? Basically if the food is good, anywhere's worth another try. As such, I popped back there for a set lunch deal on the first scorching Saturday of the summer season.

Their lunch offer was £20 for three courses, which seemed ludicrously reasonable, and it did not disappoint. Something similar to the goose egg risotto we'd tried before was a poached duck egg with toasted brown bread and truffle sauce (left). And that is a fine way to start any Saturday lunch. The risotto of beef, beetroot and garlic that completed the course was challenging, but very fresh. Not quite as you expect risotto – much lighter and more summery – it did the job nicely.

I have recently found that good starters don't often lead to a good main course. Fortunately Launceston Place was up to the demanding task of round two. Some delectable pork crubeens (small morsels made primarily from trotters) were just the ticket, served with beautifully decorative (yet not redundant) dressings and sauce (right). The lamb on the other side of the table was extremely well-formed, requiring little effort to pull apart. Nice herb crust, creamy mashed potato and overall we had two courses that were filling but not intrusively so. Good work indeed.

Dessert was a quite brilliant apple tarte tatin to share (left). Crisp, buttery, sweet and filling, it was nothing short of sublime. In fact, it was the best tatin I've eaten, and that includes some fine efforts in Paris. It was slightly chunkier than the traditional French thinly-sliced apple, but that seemed to make it better. Graciously sliced and served at the table, it was bliss.

So, what of the re-visit? Well it was better, there's no doubting it. The service was better too (for the most part. Although I swear the sommelier visibly gritted his teeth when we told him we weren't drinking…) It was a pleasant lunch, topped off with a cracking dessert, which made me realise a lot of the good press Launceston Place has gotten is indeed deserved. Hopefully there's no more bad press to come from me.


Launceston Place

Saturday 9 October 2010

Gaucho – Sloane Square, Wednesday 19th May, 2010

I'd heard enough about Gaucho for long enough to jump at the chance when a visiting friend invited me to try it. We met at the Sloane Square branch of the steakhouse chain for a late dinner which was very enjoyable but more for the company and the occasion than the meal.

Gaucho is a strange place in that it leans towards a number of muddled franchises, without doing any one of them especially well. It's an Argentinean steak house, which conjures up the image of hazy, sun-bleached plains awash with cattle and tender-hearted Latin American farmers serving up tenderloin barbecued beef. Instead it presents itself as a chic luxury brasserie, complete with bullish dining room (no pun intended), too-dim lighting and bustle up to the earholes. There was something unsettling about the cowskin-coated seating that didn't quite feel right with me.

The meal was not inedible, unpleasant or unprofessional. It was unexceptional, life-drainingly forced and too expensive. I don't think Gaucho is a bad restaurant (or chain of restaurants) (and this annoys me too – how do you judge a chain on one visit to one of their outlets? It isn't entirely quantifiable) but equally I can't say I want to go there again. Unless someone's picking up the bill and I can order a huge hunk of filet mignon. (Hang on, that's bife de lomo at Gaucho.)

The gimmick at Gaucho is that they serve premium steak which is brought, raw, to the table beforehand so you can choose your cut and the staff can tell you what to expect from a particular piece of beef. It's kind of fun, but straining to see things in the light as we were, I was content to examine the menu for my choices.

The gimmick itself is pretty naff, like much of the Gaucho experience. It's showiness for the sake of it, which is frustrating because the food isn't bad. I mean, it's not quite as good as their sleeker-than-sleek leather veneer and marked-up prices suggest, but not bad. The steaks are served fairly simply and you can add sides to them. Interestingly, the best dish I tried all evening was their veal Milanese, but at nearly £20, it would've taken more than interesting to impress me.

The steak itself (a piece of sirloin at £21) should've been better than it was, the salad and chips weren't bad, the toffee cheesecake for dessert was too sweet then wrenched into blips of sour unpleasantness by the coffee grit they put in it. They overcomplicated a scallop starter – I didn't know Argentina was big on scallops, and on this showing, they're right not to be – to the point of spiced, dressing-addled distraction.

I think the general word I would use to describe the food at Gaucho would be 'passable'. It's by no means worth what they think it is, but the place was packed at 10pm on a Wednesday, so something's going right for them.

As I have said, I doubt I'll go back to Gaucho. There's something quite off-putting about the ambience, something more off-putting about the prices and nothing that makes it click in to place. I'm afraid that I'd rather pay half the amount of money to eat a late midweek dinner at one of many other places in London; Argentinean steak or not.


Gaucho

Afternoon Tea in the West End: Brumus – Piccadilly, Sunday 16th May, 2010

A friend of mine once quoted afternoon tea as being “one of the UK’s best inventions”. She’s right, of course. There’s something extremely English (or British, maybe) about sitting down for a few hours in an afternoon to daintily munch your way into a sugary, buttery haze.
Brumus is part of the Haymarket Hotel, bang in the middle of the tourist hustle and bustle of Piccadilly, which makes it immediately soulless – not expensive enough to be classy, not downbeat enough to be fun – but within its lifeless exterior, something a little more enterprising lurks.
The tea menu there is just about standard: scones, cakes, sandwiches and a pot of char. I asked for some orange juice instead of tea, which was met with the usual hotel restaurant palaver of “well I’ll see what I can do but people always have tea with afternoon tea you difficult so-and-so”. (I got my orange juice eventually, so well done to our waiter for breaking protocol.)
There wasn’t much to complain about from this outing: it was easily done afternoon tea in a fairly standard restaurant. That said, it’s easy to ruin things as easy as sandwiches and scones, so full marks to Brumus for not doing so. Well, not full marks – the scones were a bit small, and a few of the cakes were on the sickly sweet side.
If you’re in the West End and you fancy a spot of afternoon tea that isn’t served off paper plates from a St James Park café, check it out (left). At £18 per head for a fair whack of afternoon tea (and whack we did – a thoroughly unnecessary second helping of cakes plonked on at the end) is not a bad shout. And watching droves of tourists traipsing past whilst you feel snooty as anything? You can’t complain about that.

Friday 8 October 2010

One O One – Knightsbridge, Saturday 15th May, 2010

This was a re-visit, and although the meal was not as great as the first time I ate at this place, I wasn't doing the blog then, so it deserves a write-up. Plus it was still a fun meal, so that's something we all need to hear about.

One O One has been in Knightsbridge for a good ten years now, and head chef Pascal Proyart has been honing a fairly impressive reputation for quality seafood within the rather monstrous Sheraton Park Tower Hotel. Situated between the busy section of road that runs from Hyde Park Corner to Knightsbridge, but before the business end of Harvey Nichols and Harrods, the place is a kind of haven from the tourist-packed hustle and bustle of the area.

The restaurant itself is not well-designed. The whole thing has an air of conference room about it, but it somehow doesn't feel like a hotel restaurant at the same time. There is a huge area that you pass on your way in to the main restaurant which I have never seen used, which means it's either the most over-sized tasteless private dining area around, or they just never get that busy.

On this particular Saturday, the place was humming with lunch-goers. Probably because of the 50% off deal they were offering, but still: busy. I couldn't help but feel the restaurant probably wasn't equipped to deal with such volumes, at least when it comes to staff. Again, not using their conference-space made the whole thing feel a bit like you were in a busy office, but there happened to be food there.

Right, I think I'm done ranting about the place itself, so I might as well get on to the food. Fortunately, as soon as our starters were placed before us, the whirlwind of flustered waiters and chatty diners faded away in the light of a divine trio of oysters. As great as oysters are, I've never been much of a fan. I can eat one and that's enough for me. One O One seems as if it's been listening to me and served us three styles on one plate (left). The yuzu sorbet with vodka was great, the classic shallot vinegar was better, but the tempura-battered oyster took the first prize. Just eating a battered oyster is wonderful in itself; it is like having foie gras and chips.

Our starters proper weren't too shabby either. Some scallops with pork belly and a delightful splurge of quail's egg along with potato was over-sauced but opulent in the extreme. A lobster salad was not quite a salad per se, but it was a vibrant mixture of apple dressings, chilled langoustine-y richness and a bit of stellar presentation to boot (right).

The first time I'd been here, the other half and I had eaten almost totally meat, the unsophisticated boors that we are. This time, we just had to try some fish, which came in the shape of Norwegian halibut, served with truffled cassoulet and tiger prawn dumplings. Now, if you're going to combine such richly ambitious flavours and textures, it had better go without a hitch. Sadly, this was a case of small hitches all over the shop masking any serious potential in the dish. The truffles were an afterthought to the cassoulet, which threatened to overwhelm everything, leaving the fish nearly redundant and the dumpling a pretty sideshow. Not great, unfortunately.

So, back to meat - not what this place is famous for, I remind you - and things were a little better. Well, set to the tune of spring lamb in May, I'll enjoy whatever you put in front of me (left). Good things: the lamb was cooked correctly and beautifully, the parmesan was a sharp spear of salty contrast, and it looked great. Bad things: they had tried to go for colour over taste - there was no need to over-complicate things with the addition of garlic gnocchi (yes, we can see: they're green!) and olives, and the asparagus was slightly over-cooked. Better than the halibut, but not massively.

Desserts were a little muted, given the level of our indulgence up to that point. Some brownies were pretty decent, served with salt caramel and coffee ice cream. Sadly again, the dish had been overdone with ideas and ingredients, because the base part was good but subdued. Fortunately, the day was stolen by a sensational panna cotta served with granny smith apple and blackberry (right). A mixture of hyper-sweet creamy main event with the chilled sour snaps of the sorbet on the side... Take notes, Proyart - this is how you combine ingredients to make them sing.

One O One will always have a special place in my heart, since the first time I came here it was a meal I can look back on with sentimental eyes and a satisfied stomach. This second time was still nice, but some of the dishes have been overcomplicated to the point of pretentious confusion. If they can take things back to basics, they might yet fill up that conference room. There are soaring highs to be had at One O One, but let's hope they know how to find them.


One O One

Wednesday 1 September 2010

London’s Best..? Santa Maria – Ealing, Wednesday 12th May, 2010

After reading a piece in Time Out some time back about London’s best pizza, I decided I just had to visit the number one venue. On a balmy Wednesday night, I forsook watching Fulham come close to Europa League glory and wandered out to Ealing with a very scrutinising face on.

Pizza is quintessential Italian (or, rather, Italian-American) rustic food. It is no-frills, no-complications fare. There is something wonderfully universal about pizza: it is just so popular: hell, I’ll wolf down a Domino’s once in a while (but I draw the line at Pizza Hut). In fact, I’d go so far as to say I don’t fully trust people who don’t like pizza. Suspect judgemental calls aside, I did wonder the following: how do you quantify impeccable pizza?

Okay, there are areas you can touch on for sure… The base must be soft, thin and crunchy at the crust. The toppings must be generous, flavoursome and yet not overdone. The finish should be not at all greasy but certainly not too dry. You can go on and on (as I once did about burgers), but the point is it’s damn hard to judge anything so well-loved.

Santa Maria has not been open long (it opened earlier this year) but its rise to fame has been metronomic. The feature in Time Out all but pushed it to superstar status. So much so that two of us went there at 9pm on a Wednesday night and still had to wait for 15 minutes to get seated. I can sort of see why.

Firstly, everyone in Ealing is delighted they’re so close to such a popular and famous eatery that they can call their own. And I don’t blame them for that. Secondly, it’s just so rustic and pretty that anybody would want to go there. Opposite a small green, housing a traditional wood-fired oven and buzzing with patrons, who wouldn’t pop in there on the odd evening? Lastly, the pizza is good. Really good, in fact. But not amazing. Hang on, has pizza ever been amazing?

Whilst I chewed on my first mouthful, I thought three things: one, this is not the best pizza I’d ever eaten; two, what is the best pizza I’d ever eaten?; and three, by heaven, the dough was perfect. I can’t honestly say what the best pizza I’ve ever eaten was or where I ate it. There’s something about pizza at a roadside café in Italy that galvanises the senses, thick American pizza has a delightful charm, and even some of the stuff you get in Soho is great. But the best..? A tough call indeed.

So, the bases are just incredible: perfectly soft underneath, perfectly crisp on the crust and perfectly thin. That’s one excellent factor taken care of. Now, as for the rest, it just didn't quite click. We tried two pizzas, the Santa Carmela (ham and mushroom) and the San Daniele (drier base with cherry tomatoes, rocket, ham and parmesan.) I felt the first would be perfect and the second was a more adventurous choice. In the event, the safe choice of ham and mushroom proved to be something of a letdown (left).

The toppings were fairly slapdash, and it looked as if it had been thrown together with a minimum of fuss. Now, if you want to produce and serve food in that way, I have no problem. But it has to be good if you want to do so. Not that this pizza was bad as such, it just could've been nicer. Surprisingly, the second effort was better (right). Even though it looked a bit dry and bland, the combination worked perfectly. I think this was where the excellent bases really came into their own. Despite fairly large sections of crust, it was never dry, never tough and never too chewy.

So, two pizzas down, off we went. I cannot clearly say this is the best pizza I've eaten in London, but as I mentioned earlier, I couldn't really say what is. Santa Maria is good - at times great - but there is something missing. One final topping of quality, you might say. It's almost there but not quite. Personally I think it's to do with the publicity and reputation they've acquired from being awarded London's best pizza: it's easy to start increasing turnover at the expense of quality in the face of such fame.

All that said, however, I would go back. It's a little ironic that if I hadn't read about this being London's best pizza, I might not have been there, yet having gone there with that knowledge, I found it a little disappointing. I still don't know how to judge perfect pizza. Maybe there just isn't any in London. Maybe pizza is never perfect. Maybe it's impossible to judge. However, Santa Maria..? An utterly charming, genuine local eatery. Good for them.


Santa Maria